Henkan News ·
CRMAcquisitionsMartechContractsDataVendors

One martech tool in seven has changed owner since 2023: what serial acquisitions change for e-commerce teams

Alexandre Suon·8 min read·
The Martech Market Report visual: nine martech tool logos, each followed by the name of its new owner
The official visual of The Martech Market Report (edition 1, autumn 2026): some of the tools that have changed owner since 2023.

The Martech Market Report reviewed 464 vendors and checked every deal against its source: 68 tools have changed hands since 2023, and the pace is picking up. What the report measures, what an acquisition really changes for an e-commerce team, and three questions to ask before you sign.

In this articleShow all sectionsHide
  1. 30-second summary
  2. 1. The report
  3. 2. The numbers
  4. 3. At renewal
  5. 4. What stays stuck
  6. 5. Before you sign
  7. 6. Where to start
  8. Key terms
  9. Sources

30-second summary

ShowHide ⌄
  • The Martech Market Report, published by Martech Stack Builder, reviewed all 464 vendors in its catalogue. Research closed on 11 October 2026.
  • 68 products have been bought, merged, taken private or sold on since 2023: one in seven.
  • The pace is picking up: 8 ownership changes in 2023, 14 in 2024, 25 in 2025 and already 21 in 2026 as of 11 October.
  • Tools that changed hands publish their price less often: 32% show a starting price, against 44% for the others.
  • An acquisition changes little on announcement day and a lot at renewal. The real risk is the data and learnings that don't move with you.

Section 1 · The report

464 vendors reviewed, every deal checked against its source

Martech Stack Builder, a tool for mapping and evaluating marketing stacks, published the first edition of The Martech Market Report in October. The team went through the 464 vendors in its catalogue, 88 of them not yet published on its site, and looked up who owns each one today, what it is called now and whether it shows a price.

The method is what makes the report useful. For each vendor, an AI researcher listed ownership events since 1 January 2023 and quoted the sentence from the primary source that states each one: a press release, an investor relations page or a regulatory filing. A script then checked that sentence against the page it came from. An event only appears in the report if it passed that check or a person verified it. 20 events found but not verified are left out of every figure.

A limit the report owns up to The catalogue lists tools that exist today. A tool bought and shut down in 2023 is not in it, and older deals are harder to find online. The authors ask readers to treat the early years as a floor, not an exact count. The trend will show from one edition to the next, measured the same way.

Section 2 · The numbers

68 tools have changed hands, and the pace is picking up

Out of 464 products, 68 have been bought, merged, taken private, sold on or agreed to be sold since 2023. That is one tool in seven. The report also counts 34 renames, 5 of them tied to AI or agents.

Exhibit 1 · Ownership changes by year
Catalogue products bought, merged, taken private, sold on or agreed to be sold
202382024142025252026 (to 11 Oct)21
Source : The Martech Market Report, edition 1, autumn 2026, Martech Stack Builder. One 2026 deal is announced but not yet closed.

Who is buying? Mostly other software companies, then private equity. The report also points to a quieter trend: agency holding groups and data companies are buying the identity and data layer that audiences are built on.

Exhibit 2 · Who is buying martech tools
Number of products, counted under their current owner
Software companies44Private equity13Data companies5Agency groups4Other2
Source : The Martech Market Report, edition 1, autumn 2026, Martech Stack Builder

The tools an e-commerce team uses every day are part of it: analytics, A/B testing, CRM, loyalty. A few examples from the report's deal list:

Exhibit 3 · Some of the changes recorded in e-commerce tools
ToolUsed forWhat changedDate
HeapProduct analyticsBought by ContentsquareDec 2023
SiteSpectA/B testingBought by MonetateJun 2025
AB TastyA/B testingMerged with VWO, then joint Wingify brandJan and Sep 2026
StatsigExperimentationHanded by OpenAI to AmplitudeMay 2026
BluecoreRetail marketingBought by Insider OneMay 2026
Talon.OneLoyalty and promotionsBought by AdyenJul 2026
Source : The Martech Market Report, edition 1, autumn 2026, Martech Stack Builder (deal list, each linked to its source)

The list kept growing after the report closed: on 20 October, Salesforce signed a definitive agreement to buy Braze. We covered how that acquisition will unfold.

Section 3 · At renewal

An acquisition changes nothing on announcement day. It changes a lot at renewal

On the day a deal is announced, the tool works as it did the day before and the current contract still applies. The changes come later, often at renewal: the new owner reviews the price, the roadmap and the integrations it considers a priority, usually those with its own products.

The report gives a concrete example. After Fivetran bought it, the data activation tool Census was folded into its buyer's platform as Fivetran Activations and moved onto Fivetran's consumption-based pricing. Same job, new pricing model.

Pricing also gets harder to read. Across the whole catalogue, 42% of vendors show a starting price on their site. The gap between acquired tools and the rest is clear:

Exhibit 4 · Share of tools that publish a starting price
Price shown by the vendor on its own site, not a quote
Changed hands (68)32%All others (396)44%
Source : The Martech Market Report, edition 1, autumn 2026, Martech Stack Builder

What a gap in published prices means for you A tool with no public price is sold on quote. You have fewer points of comparison, and how the price moves from one renewal to the next depends more on negotiation. The report does not say acquired tools cost more: it finds they show their price less often.

Section 4 · What stays stuck

The real risk is what doesn't move with you

Switching tools is never simple, but a contract can be renegotiated and an integration rebuilt. What costs most is what the team has built up inside the tool over the years and that doesn't come out cleanly:

  • A/B test history: hypotheses, variants, results and decisions. If it only lives in the testing tool, it goes with it, and the team ends up re-running tests it has already run.
  • CRM segments: the rules that define a loyal customer, an at-risk customer or an abandoned cart are often written in the tool's own logic.
  • The tracking plan: events and their properties are often named the tool's way. On switch day, dashboards and year-on-year comparisons break.
“An acquired tool is often still a good tool. You just need to choose it knowing it may change hands.”

Section 5 · Before you sign

Three questions to ask before every signature

These questions apply to a new tool as much as to a renewal. They are not about avoiding vendors that might be bought, which is impossible at one in seven, but about staying in control if it happens.

  1. Can we export all our data, in a readable format, at no extra cost? Ask for the list of what can be exported (raw data, configuration, segments, history) and in which format.
  2. What does the contract say if the vendor changes owner? Look at the commitment term, renewal terms, notice period and price protection.
  3. Are our learnings stored with us, or only in the tool? Test results, segment definitions and the tracking plan should live somewhere you own.

Section 6 · Where to start

Where to start this week

Exhibit 5 · Four steps to map your exposure
  1. 1
    List your tools and their renewal datesA simple table is enough: tool, use, current owner, contract end date, notice period.
  2. 2
    Check who owns each tool todayThe report's deal list, each entry linked to its source, is a free download. Compare it with your table.
  3. 3
    Run a real exportFor the tools that hold your test history, segments or tracking, do a full export now, not on the day you need it.
  4. 4
    Prepare the next renewalAdd the three questions to your negotiation grid and get the answers written into the contract.
Henkan's point of view. Consolidation is not a reason to avoid a tool: one in seven has changed hands, and many are still good tools. It is a reason to separate what belongs to the tool from what belongs to the company. A solid experimentation programme keeps its test history, segments and tracking plan in-house, documented in its own terms. When a vendor changes owner, the price gets renegotiated; the learnings should not be up for negotiation.

Key terms

ShowHide ⌄
Martech
The software marketing and e-commerce teams use: analytics, A/B testing, CRM, email, personalization, customer data management.
Take-private
The purchase of a listed company by a private equity firm, which delists it. The product keeps running under a new owner.
Published starting price
A price the vendor shows on its own site, as opposed to a rate you can only get through a quote.
Tracking plan
The list of events measured on a site or app (product view, add to cart, purchase) with their names and properties.
Reversibility
The ability to leave a tool and take your data with you in a usable format, as written into the contract.

Sources

ShowHide ⌄
  1. Martech Stack Builder, “The Martech Market Report”, edition 1, autumn 2026 (research closed 11 October 2026)
  2. Salesforce, “Salesforce Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Braze”, press release of 20 October 2026, filed with the SEC
Alexandre Suon
Alexandre SuonManaging Partner, Henkan & Partners

Alexandre co-founded and runs Henkan & Partners. He decodes one e-commerce story every day on LinkedIn.

Follow Alexandre ↗